Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racism. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 20, 2023

Chatting with 1/6 comic book writer Alan Jenkins about insurrections and threats to democracy

 by Mike Rhode

On the weekend of Juneteenth, and Awesome Con, I had the opportunity to speak with Professor Alan Jenkins, co-writer of 1/6: A Graphic Novel, which was funded through Kickstarter, released digitally earlier this year, and now the first issue is now being distributed in print as a standard comic book. I think we had an excellent and eye-opening talk, and I’m very glad that we met when he was down for the Con.  Here’s some background from his press release:

Harvard Law professor Alan Jenkins, who is heading to D.C. this weekend for ComicCon to showcase his new book, 1/6: The Graphic Novel. This unique work delves into an alternate history, envisioning what would have happened if the January 6th Insurrection at the US Capitol Building had succeeded. It's one of the first pop culture vehicles to take on the insurrection, representing Alan's ongoing commitment to leveraging popular culture for social change. Comic books have a rich history in the fight for democracy and freedom from bigotry. The first issue of Captain America featured the superhero socking HItler in the jaw—nine months before the U.S. entered WWII. Drawing inspiration from this legacy, Alan, an avid comic book enthusiast and prolific writer on the intersection of pop culture and social change, joined forces with NY Times bestselling author Gan Golan to create a compelling graphic novel that tells the story of 1/6 in a compelling way. Their aim is to inspire everyday Americans to become engaged and demand a better future as our right to a free and fair election faces threats. This release follows the success of the team's previous superhero comic, Helvetika Bold, which galvanized a wide audience to take action for social justice. Alan is not only a Harvard Law professor but also a columnist for The Hollywood Reporter and a regular commentator on CBS and MSNBC. He teaches courses at Harvard Law on Race and the Law and Social Justice, and co-founded The Opportunity Agenda, a social justice communication lab.

Alan's previous interviews have been with with CNNVICECNETWashington Post (with our buddy Michael Cavna),  and WNYC so we’re in good company.


Mike Rhode: What type of comic work do you do?

Alan Jenkins:  I'm a freshman comic book writer. This is my first book. I produced a short comic book several years ago, but this is my first time actually writing.

Mike Rhode: What was the short comic you produced?

Alan Jenkins:

It was called Helvetika Bold. My former organization that I co-founded, the Opportunity Agenda, we thought that a comic book would be a good way to lift our profile and explain what we do, and we were correct. The organization works on communication strategies to advance opportunity and human rights in the US.

Mike Rhode: And that was a giveaway from the organization?

 Alan Jenkins: Yes, exactly.

Mike Rhode: Regarding 1/6, your new comic, I'm going to ask how actually you pronounce it.

Alan Jenkins: One six.

Mike Rhode: So it's not “one slash six,” it’s going to be four issues, and it's a standard comic book size book. Why don't you give us the basic plot?

Alan Jenkins: The series asks and answers the question: What if the January 6, 2021 insurrection had been successful?  It follows actual events up until the point at which many people will remember, especially in the DC area, when Officer Eugene Goodman led the mob away from the Senate Chamber on January 6th. As a whole, the series follows the events that led to the insurrection, both physical and political. And then it imagines a world in which the mob turned right instead of left, and they entered the Senate Chamber. They did everything they were threatening to do. Then President Trump does many of the things that he was threatening to do: declaring martial law and deputizing the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, which they were asking him to do. Democracy is extinguished, and then the remainder of the series is about everyday people coming together to try to restore the democracy. Also, as the founders of our country did, arguing not only about how best to win, but about what kind of country should emerge. Just as Hamilton and Madison and Jefferson were arguing about what our constitution should be, even as they were fighting the British [ed. note: Professor Jenkins is slightly hyperbolic here for the sake of the story. Actually, the Constitutional Convention took place later in 1789, after the war was won and the Articles of Confederation proved inadequate to maintain a government, and new agreements and rules were required]. Our characters are having those same arguments. At the end of the series, we expect readers will have some hope, but I won't spoil the ending.

Mike Rhode: Because you still have three issues to come too. Why is this a graphic novel instead of short novella?

Alan Jenkins: The short answer is I love comics and I love democracy. There's a long history of comic books being both entertaining and upholding the values of democracy and fighting authoritarianism and bigotry. The first Captain America issue has a cover of Cap slugging Adolf Hitler in the jaw. This was six or nine months before the US entered World War II. Cap’s creators, Joe Simon and Jack Kirby were young Jewish Americans. They had family in Europe under threat of the Nazis and what became the Holocaust. They created an amazing hero and were intent on depicting Adolf Hitler as the villain that he was. Superman fought the Ku Klux Klan in the 1950s [on his radio show]. The Black Panther fought the Ku Klux Klan in the 1970s. And then there are graphic novels like Maus and others. This is a part of a long tradition. It seemed very natural. In addition to that, I and my co-writer Gan Golan wanted to reach a broad audience, including people who maybe don't have the time to read an 800-page report from the January 6th committee. Maybe they aren't glued to CNN or reading the Washington Post as vehemently as we are, but they care about our democracy. In addition, if you're 80 years old, you grew up with comics in the US, if you're eight years old, you're growing up with comics now, and you don't have to have an advanced degree to read them. You don't have to be super fluent in English in order to consume and understand comic books. And so it felt like just the right vehicle for us.

Mike Rhode: You mentioned your co-author. How did the team come together?

Gan Golan

Alan Jenkins: I had worked with Gan on the previous comic book that I mentioned, Helvetika Bold. He's a New York Times award-winning graphic novelist mm-hmm. When I had this idea to do a graphic novel, not only about the insurrection, but with this speculative fiction idea of “what if the insurrection had been successful?” he was the first person I called. In part because I wanted to work with him, and in part because I wanted to see what he thought about the idea, “Is this gonna fly? Does this make any sense?” He's very busy, because he's a climate activist, but he immediately said, “Yeah, we've gotta do this. But I can't do the art.” He's a very talented artist, but he said he didn't have the bandwidth. So he and I wrote the script. We've been writing each issue, and we assembled a team of veteran industry artists to do the artwork and I'm really, really pleased with what they've done. Will Rosado, who's a veteran DC and Marvel artist, is our main penciler and inker. [Lee Loughridge does colors and letters are by Tom Orzechowski].

Mike Rhode: Did you form your own company to publish this?

Alan Jenkins: We did. We wanted to move very quickly. So the first issue came out in digital form on January 6th of this year. We'd have to jump through too many hoops in order to go the traditional publishing route. We just jumped in and created OneSix Comix.

Mike Rhode: And it's partially funded through grants?

Alan Jenkins: That's correct. We did a Kickstarter, and we also approached a number of funders.

Mike Rhode: How do you write? Did you and Gan just write a full script with what the action should be? Or did you do it more like Marvel method, where you wrote roughly what you wanted and then expected the artists to interpret it?

Will Rosado

Alan Jenkins: It was a mix. I would say we got more Marvel style as we got more comfortable with our artist. Gan and I sat down together many hours doing what they call in TV screenwriting, “breaking story.” Like, “What's gonna happen? What are the big moments? What are the images that we need to include?” We actually created some images up on the monitor for us that we could look at, and then we committed it to a script which is quite specific. But then we also told, Will, our main artist, “Look, we want you to try things out to experiment,” and he definitely came up with some ways of conveying big ideas that were both more compelling and more succinct than what we had created.

Mike Rhode: Did you do thumbnails or was it just a written script?

Alan Jenkins: Written script. And then there's a lot of real places and people so there’s a lot of reference images.

Mike Rhode: In fact, the front cover appears to have Mike Pence hanging, or at least Mike Pence's feet.

Alan Jenkins: Well, we intentionally left that ambiguous, but you can see in the lower right hand corner is the Vice Presidential pin. We want to depict what the rioters and the Insurrectionists told us they were going to do. And that was certainly one of those things.

Mike Rhode: Let me ask one more thing about your artist before we move on to more general stuff. Is this all digital drawing, or is there a paper and ink behind it?

Alan Jenkins: Will's process? He does both. He works in both media.

Mike Rhode:  It looks like you did variant covers with people that are known as either African-American cartoonists or political cartoonists, since I guess Pia Guerra has switched to being an editorial cartoonist. I assume one of you reached out to find additional people?

Shawn Martinbrough art

Alan Jenkins: Both of us thought it would be a great opportunity to bring in other artists who might not have the time to do an entire issue or series, but could give us a compelling image. Alex Albadree's variant is coming out soon. [The other cover artists are Jamal Igle and Shawn Martinbrough]

Mike Rhode: How do you actually buy it now? How does one buy the copy of the book?

Alan Jenkins: You can get it on Amazon. You can get it at http://www.onesixcomics.com , and we're starting to market it through comic book stores. It’s in about a dozen comic book stores right now [and stores can order it wholesale here]. While I'm here in the DC area. I'm going to visit a few more and see who might want to carry it. I’m hoping that your readers will ask for it because I would much rather sell it that way. Amazon sales are great, and they're doing very well…

Mike Rhode: But they take an amazing amount of money off the top…

Alan Jenkins: Money and time, and you don't always know what you're getting. I want people to be able to see the quality of the book, of which we're very proud. So I would like it to be available in comic stores as well.

Mike Rhode: Let's go back to your background now - when and where were you born?

Alan Jenkins: I was born in the sixties on Long Island, New York, and I grew up in New York, and spent most of my years, other than in college, in Brooklyn.

Mike Rhode: The book is dedicated to your mom, Olga Jenkins. And I see she had a doctorate, so did she inspire your career?

Alan Jenkins: Yeah, very much. She had a doctorate in education, while her parents did not finish high school. They were immigrants from The Bahamas. My mom was dyslexic, and, grew up really in poverty in Philadelphia and, through intelligence and hard work, became a teacher. She was a math teacher, and got a doctorate in education from Columbia Teacher's College.

Mike Rhode: That’s the real story of immigrants in America.

Alan Jenkins: Yeah, exactly. And she was a civil rights activist, which also influenced me, in a lot of my career as a civil rights lawyer.

Mike Rhode: Your degree is in law? Where'd you take that from?

Alan Jenkins: From Harvard, and that's where I'm teaching now.

Mike Rhode: And that's where you're teaching? So you commute to Boston?

Alan Jenkins:  Yeah, every week during the school year.

Mike Rhode: All right. <Laugh>, everything's a decision. So why are you visiting DC now?

Alan Jenkins: I'm here for Awesome Con, which so far has been awesome. Great. Just as advertised. And I love DC. I spent several years here, the weather's great today, and I'm enjoying hanging out. I'm gonna visit some comic book stores and see some friends.

Mike Rhode: Returning to 1/6, can you explain how you learned to write a comic? You said this was your second one. It doesn't sound like you've done storyboarding from movies or anything like that. Did you look at a book? Did you just talk to your co-author and decide to take his lead?

Alan Jenkins: This is actually the first one that I've written, because for the other one I was just the publisher. It was a mix of inspirations. I read a lot of comic books. I've been reading comic books all my life, but I returned to speculative fiction works, recent ones such as DMZ and Calexit. And the George Orwell 1984 graphic novel adaptation and V for Vendetta. I looked at a lot of different types of work. I looked at Scott McCloud and his book Making Comics. And I learned a ton from, and I'm still learning from, my co-writer Gan Golan and from Will, because it's an interactive process, right? We'll write something and Will will say, “You know what, what's this? I don't know how to depict this.” And then we'll have to go back and make it clear or do it differently. It's been a constant, very steep learning curve and constant learning over time.

Mike Rhode: I've got to say for your first comic you picked good collaborators because it runs very smoothly, and sometimes it's very hard to write this sequential nature of a page. I think it's easier to jump from scene to scene to scene, in which case, it's more of an illustrated story and less of a comic.

Alan Jenkins: Well, thank you. Yeah, it's a different medium. I've done some screenwriting, but in screenwriting you'll say, “Joe walks into the room,” and here either he is in the room or he is not in the room.  Figuring out that one image that depicts a whole series of events or motion is really a new skill.

Mike Rhode: We just talked about your influences for the book, but was John Lewis’ March an Influence?

Alan Jenkins: Absolutely. I actually knew John Lewis. I don't know how well he knew me, but we had spent time together. He’s a huge inspiration, for my entire life, not just in comic books. The fact that he chose to tell his own story through a graphic novel, is very inspiring. And I think because it did well, it signified that it was okay -- that this was a legitimate storytelling form for serious material, and that it could be profitable or at least, marketable. Yeah, it was very important. There was Martin Luther King and the Montgomery Story, a comic book [link to download a pdf] in 1956 about King, and the Montgomery Bus Boycott, and that was in the hands of demonstrators in Tahrir Square in Egypt and helped to inform the Arab Spring and then the Occupy Wall Street movement in the U.S. I actually have that one up on my wall at home. That was also very inspiring to me. And back when I was a kid, there was something called Golden Legacy comics which was a series about black history and black leaders. My dad got me the whole series of those. I have them somewhere in my attic. So the idea of comic books relating stories of civil rights and democracy and equal dignity was, to me, a very long tradition and felt very natural.

Mike Rhode: Did you do the bicycle ride to 7-Eleven in the 1970s before comic book stores?

Alan Jenkins: I did indeed. We had Frederick’s Stationary and every Wednesday we were there right after school. I also went to some of the earliest comic cons back in New York City. Around 1973, Marvel had a convention. It was just Marvel and I still have the program from it. And I went to some of the early New York Comic Cons where it was just comics. It was a very small, intimate bunch.

Mike Rhode: The guys in the bottom of the hotel…

Alan Jenkins:  <Laugh> Exactly. Exactly.

Mike Rhode: So are you a DC person or a Marvel one? Sounds like a Marvel guy.

Alan Jenkins: Oh, definitely Marvel. Yeah. Definitely Marvel. DC's come a long way in terms of nuance and sophistication and storytelling. But yeah, coming up I was very much a Marvel kid.

Mike Rhode: After this set of comics, what do you want to do? Do you want to do more comics? Do you have an idea?

Alan Jenkins: Yeah, I would love to do more. Now that we've created One Six Comics I think it would be great to take on some other subjects, but we haven't even discussed it. We’ve got three more of this one to do.

Mike Rhode? Although you may have to change your logo of a hangman's noose over the Capitol building, depending on where you go after this.

Alan Jenkins: We'll see.

Mike Rhode: What do you think about the current political climate? Unfortunately, your book is coming out in a time of pushback by what we would consider the regressive forces, and obviously you are speaking against them, but your book is a dystopia where they won. You must see some hope for the future, but in the meantime, is there anything you want to say?

Alan Jenkins: I'm very worried about the future of our democracy and the fundamental principle that we're all created equal. I think most of the forces that led to the insurrection on January 6th are still with us. There's been accountability for many individuals who showed up because President Trump told them to show up. People have to be held responsible for their actions, but we've seen almost no accountability for the political actors who really laid the groundwork for this insurrection. There are still 179 election deniers in Congress who were either elected or reelected in the 2022 midterms. The forces of anti-Semitism and racism and xenophobia that fueled the insurrection, the actual riot, are still very much with us. I'm very worried, which is one of the main reasons why we wrote the series.

At the same time, I do have a lot of hope. I think that we have in our country a history and a legacy of standing up to bigotry, of standing up to authoritarianism and defending democracy. It was a small group of elected and appointed officials, mostly Republicans, who said “no” to the coup. Instead of just choosing teams, they insisted on playing by the rules. And that gives me a lot of hope. The activism of the American public right now in this era similarly does -- the Black Lives Matter movement and the Immigrant Rights Movement, and many of these movements for voting rights and justice all give me a lot of hope. The story's unwritten, literally and figuratively. And I'm betting on democracy.

Mike Rhode: I hope so. Democracy has meant different things in American life throughout two centuries. And forces are opposed to what I would consider true democracy, and doubling down with book bans, voting restrictions, et cetera. Every day in the newspaper we see something that's very old, but popping up again cloaked as something new.

Alan Jenkins: Yeah, that's right. In future issues, we're going to be taking on book bans and the oppression of LGBTQ Americans, and a number of other themes of that kind. Because it's set in an alternate present, we want to really see how a lot of these things play out for good and for ill.

Mike Rhode: In the first book, I noticed there are some fun pieces like the Clarence and Ginni Thomas Federal Judicial Building with a statue of them, and elsewhere there's this large statue of Trump. And one thing that made me think it was leaning towards being an African-American book, and I'm interested to hear what you say, is that Ben's Chili Bowl restaurant seems to be the center of the revolution, or at least one cell of the revolution. I noticed it's not specifically named, but those of us in DC will realize it's Ben's Chili Bowl <laugh>.

Alan Jenkins: It's one of my favorite locations in the city. It's endured and weathered so much. Ben's certainly was the inspiration for the center of the resistance. But it's a multicultural resistance. It's including white folks, and one thing that was very important to us. As you'll see, there's a MAGA voter who's one of our main characters. We really believe it's important to treat everyone with empathy, to try to understand people's motivations, rather than demonize them. There are bad guys in this story, but there are also people who are kind of coming to grips with it, who believe in democracy, and were duped by former President Trump and are trying to come to terms with that.  Hopefully we told the story. We are telling a story that can be appealing to everybody.

Mike Rhode: It will be appealing to many, but not everybody, I think. It's been very well done. It looks like you've got about five main characters whose story you're going to be following?

Alan Jenkins: That's about right.

Mike Rhode: It's hard to talk about the book without having spoilers, because the things that drive people to the actions that they take are shocking, but you don't want to ruin the book for people. Have you guys hit any ruts or writer's blocks while you've been working on this?

Alan Jenkins: No, but the news has been constantly changing. Issue number one is set a few months after the successful insurrection. Issue two jumps back to the events leading up to the insurrection. And we were learning more and more and more about those events. We have a Google doc, which is our script, and every couple of days we had to go back in and try to change something. You can't include everything or it wouldn't be a compelling readable story, so we're kind of constantly making decisions about what we learned about Tucker Carlson, or Fox criticizing Trump, should we include that? I would say the biggest challenge is both reacting to emerging events and also deciding what to include and what not to include.

Mike Rhode: So the story then is obviously not written all the way through issue four. You must have an outline?

Alan Jenkins: Exactly. We have an outline.

Mike Rhode: So when do you see it wrapping up then?

Alan Jenkins: Probably around January 6th of next year.

Mike Rhode: Are you going to try to have a trade out around the same time as the four singles finish?

Alan Jenkins: We are shopping it as a full-on graphic novel, so, we'll see.

Mike Rhode: You're not necessarily publishing the full graphic novel?

Alan Jenkins: No, I think comic book publishing is enough <laugh>, so…

Mike Rhode: Is this distributed by Diamond? Or one of the other big distributors?

Alan Jenkins: Not yet. I think in part, because they don't distribute just single issues, so I think they want to make sure we have a track record.

Mike Rhode: Oh, that's right. Cold Cut used to take the single issues and they don't exist anymore.

Alan Jenkins: Yeah. But of course, the distribution channels are changing so fast. I don't know, we'll see where Diamond emerges.

Mike Rhode: Is there anything else you want to say about this project that I haven't asked?

close-up of the defaced Lincoln Memorial panel

Alan Jenkins: We have, to go along with the book, a free Education and Action Guide. There's a QR code in the back of the book, and if you scan that, readers can get direct access. We did this with the Western State Center which is a pro-democracy non-profit out of the Pacific Northwest. Some people will read the book and enjoy the book, and that'll be it. But some people, we hope will want to take action in support of democracy and challenging bigotry. The Action Guide has very specific and easy steps that people can do either as individuals in their community, or on the political policy front.

Mike Rhode: Did you actually make enough money with the Kickstarter and grants to fund the whole project? Or are you going to need to raise more money?

Alan Jenkins: It depends in part on sales, but I think we're good financially to host the whole thing. But what Kickstarter, and our supporters on Kickstarter helped us do, is get it into lots of hands. For example we sent issue one to several hundred members of Congress, including 150 election deniers. We sent several thousand copies to civil rights groups, to prodemocracy groups, to public libraries. We sent Ron DeSantis a copy. Haven't heard from him.  And also, libraries in Florida and many other states, and our Kickstarter fans really helped with that. So it takes a village.

Mike Rhode: Did any members of Congress that you sent it to respond back to you?

Alan Jenkins: Haven’t heard back from any MoCs yet.

Mike Rhode: Do you still buy comics?

Alan Jenkins: I do. And, in fact, I bought some comics at Awesome Con

Mike Rhode: Anything you want to recommend that you get regularly?

Alan Jenkins: That's a good question. I like to see what independents are doing. I like the Black and follow-up White series by Kwanza Osajyefo. It posits a world in which only black folks have superpowers, and it's not well received by society. That’s a good one. My college classmate Reggie Hudlin now owns Milestone, so I'm really interested in where that's going to go.

Mike Rhode: Do you still have a local store?

Alan Jenkins:  I do. East Side Mags in Montclair, New Jersey is my go-to place. I'm actually doing a book signing there on July 1st. The owner is Jeff Beck. Jeff was one of the people who I reached out to when I was first setting up the comic book operation, and he gave me a ton of really useful information about how to survive and thrive in the industry. So he's a hero.

Mike Rhode: What's your favorite thing about DC?

Alan Jenkins: Besides Ben's Chili Bowl? I like that DC is a place of ideas and culture, even if not always interwoven in the way that I think they should be. Obviously it's the seat of government. You have a lot of social justice and public policy organizations. You have a lot of activism. You have remarkable arts and culture here. And that's what I'm about. My career has been at the intersection of storytelling, social justice, and and law. And so this is the place for it. I think that's the crux of it.

Mike Rhode: The least favorite?

Alan Jenkins: Well, it's similar. The cynicism of and around government these days is really disheartening. I've worked in the Justice Department. I was law clerk in the Supreme Court for Harry Blackmun, the author of Roe versus Wade. And a Republican. There were people of both parties who were devoted to our democracy. Justice Blackmun was appointed by Richard Nixon, and then he ruled against Richard Nixon in the U.S. v. Nixon case about the tapes, because he believed in rights and democracy, and there's a lot less of that now.

Mike Rhode: It seems like people have chosen the side for their sports team as opposed to what's good for the country.

Alan Jenkins: I think that's unfortunately the case. It's not the first time that that's happened. We've been through McCarthyism and lots of other dark periods, and we're capable of coming out of it smarter. I think we have it in us, but it's not a foregone conclusion. It's up to us.

Mike Rhode: Unfortunately, the current trends one can track all the way to the establishment of the country or earlier. I think the current Republican party is clearly in line with Barry Goldwater's idea what the Republican Party should be which was a very white for Republican party.

Alan Jenkins: I agree with you, but it's also interesting that after Goldwater's defeat, the conservative movement spent a lot of time reinventing itself to move away from explicit racism and more towards the dog whistle. And Trump blew that up, you know? He has been saying the quiet part out loud and without consequences. It's very dangerous when elected officials, especially the most powerful in the country are explicitly racist and white supremacists, because it gives permission to lots of other people.

Mike Rhode: I noticed that when Trump was in power, that all of a sudden people were willing to say stuff that they would never have been willing to say before that.

Shawn Martinbrough art

Alan Jenkins: Exactly. And one of the things you'll see in the book is that Trump doesn't get much ink. The book is in part about Trumpism and the transcendent threats to democracy and equal dignity that he represents. But, if Trump went away tomorrow, those forces would still exist. That's an important theme of the book.

Mike Rhode: I think a lot of Trumpism actually has an economic underpinning too, as people are feeling like they're losing out on the American dream, and I think those people have been voting Republicans since Ronald Reagan was elected, which is absolutely amazing to me. Do you address that type of inequity in the books? I know you can't fit in everything.

Alan Jenkins: We do a bit. It's true that the United States was never the land of full and equal opportunity that it aspired to be, but we, at our best, have been headed in the right direction. And right now, we're headed in the wrong direction. We're less and less equal, and everyday people have less and less opportunity. And we do take that up because, to your point, that is ripe for exploitation. We know that the reasons for that have to do with laws and policies that favor the rich and suppress for instance, union organizing and other efforts. But it's very easy to blame immigrants, or people of color, and there are always going be demagogues that are going to do that.

Mike Rhode: When you come from people who have worked their way up the ladder in America, it's hard to understand the people that think that immigrants are their problem, or unions are their problem because, if you know any American history, the five-day work week was not a gift from the gods.  The Food and Drug Administration didn't magically appear one day. People had to be poisoned by corporations giving them adulterated food, and to see people turn their backs on progressivism in favor of a different type of populism has been very, very strange for my entire adult life.

Alan Jenkins: I find it baffling but also something that we have to constantly work to combat. I went to law school with Barack Obama. If anybody had asked me, “Is there anyone you know who's likely to be the first black president?” I certainly would've said Barack Obama. If somebody had asked me would that happen in 2008, I would've said, “Absolutely not.” But he is a remarkable person who was able to channel our greatest values and inspire people, majority of the electorate, to vote those values. And so we know it can be done.

Mike Rhode: Unfortunately, he became a face that people could oppose, and I think a lot of that coalesced because he was the president, not because of him personally, but just because he was a black man as president. It could have been a woman who was president and the same thing would've happened. Or an Indian-American or anybody who wasn’t a white man.

Getting back on track did the Covid 19 outbreak affect you personally or professionally?

Alan Jenkins: It did both. I was fortunate that I didn't lose any close family or friends, but did lose some people in our orbit and actually a close friend I have who was one of the first people in New York to get the virus has not fully recovered. My mom was in assisted living and so we had to visit her through the window. I was fortunate that she was on the ground floor. And we were able to interact with her. The aides, God bless 'em, would bring her to the window and open the screen and in the dead of winter we were out there. And then, professionally I was teaching and so I taught an entire academic year online on Zoom which is a terrible way to teach or learn. We adapted to it, and I think, well, and the students certainly stepped up, but it was very difficult for them. And the law school experience is not just the classes, it's not just the readings and the conversation. It's the people you interact with. It's the school, the activities that you do. I met my wife in law school, I would not have met her on Zoom. I really feel like they missed out. Many people lost much, much more than we did, and I feel very fortunate. It was a very difficult period for all of us.

Mike Rhode: Is there anything else you'd like to close with?

Alan Jenkins: I hope that your readers will check out the book, and that they will ask their local comic book stores for it. But it's also on Amazon and at http://onesixcomicsstore.com. And I hope they'll check out the Action guide, which is free online and consider the things that they can do. One of the things that we've talked to some readers about is a democracy comic book reading group to read some relevant comic books, for instance, X-Men: Days of Future Past—it’s a “what if” speculative fiction story about democracy and bigotry—and to actually read that series, which is so good. To talk about, “what does it mean for us today? What are the real things that are depicted? What are the metaphors?” The mutants have always been a metaphor for so many things, for sexual and gender identity, for race. So that's one maybe concrete suggestion. And reach out. Let us know how you're using it.

This interview is being published simultaneously on ComicsDC and IJOCA's blogs, and will appear in print in the 25:1 issue of IJOCA.

Wednesday, June 07, 2023

Dr. Ibram X Kendi and Joel Christian Gill discuss the newly released book, Stamped From The Beginning: A Graphic History of Racist Ideas in America

Andy Shallal and Busboys and Poets Books welcomed Dr. Ibram X Kendi and Joel Christian Gill to discuss the newly released book,  Stamped From The Beginning: A Graphic History of Racist Ideas in America. Although Shallal confessed this is his first graphic novel.

Cartoonist Gill is in white, Kendi in orange, Shallal in blue. The main characters are Cotton Mather, Thomas Jefferson, William Lloyd Garrison, WEB Dubois, and Angela Davis.
 

Wednesday, May 17, 2023

Tuesday, April 19, 2022

"March" returns to the Wash Post opinion page

Kids can handle learning about civil rights. So teach them.

Nate Powell and Andrew Aydin, with the late Rep. John Lewis, created the illustrated "March" trilogy about the history of the civil rights movement.

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

Please Don't Cancel Zootopia: An Editorial



by Alexandra Bowman

In light of the renewed conversation about racism in our country after the death of George Floyd, another sub-discussion has emerged. Works of art, films, and media properties with subjects relevant to the events of the past few weeks are being reexamined--and the 2016 Disney film Zootopia has once again become a topic of discussion.

The film famously attempted to tackle about 45 social and political issues. It seems, at first glance, that racism is the one central issue to the film, but closer analysis of the filmmakers’ intentions and the film’s storyline itself prove that the film is not centrally anti-racist, but anti-bias. And the reason for this, as I’ll explain, is to help explain bias to children from a bird’s-eye view, and should not be condemned for its mission--to help teach the very young to seek out and eliminate prejudice within themselves.

There is a seven-part documentary available for viewing on YouTube about the multi-year creative process behind the movie. Throughout, and in Part Seven especially, the filmmakers speak about their intentions while creating the film, the effect they hoped the film would have on its viewers, and the effect of the film on their own children. 

“You certainly look at the world through a different lens after telling a story like this… Maybe I can do better. Maybe I’m looking at things the wrong way. I’ve been thinking about how to have those conversations [about bias] with my kids… the process of the movie has already changed how I talk to them, and how I want them to hopefully perceive the world differently,” stated co-director Jared Bush.

“I think in my own family. When I look at my little boy, I see a very Asian face. I first and foremost want to instill that he should be proud of who he is no matter what. You know, this world, it’s not easy to not be white. So, as much kind of inner strength and inner confidence and belief that he can do anything is what I want to instill. I hope this movie is part of that,“ says co-head of Story Josie Trinidad.

While some may argue that what the filmmakers intended to do doesn’t matter, and that the thing they ultimately created speaks for itself while their motives in creating the film are of little-to-no relevance, given that recent attacks on Zootopia have been leveled toward its creators--attacks that accuse them of being insensitive in their discussion of complex issues within the film and putting forth a sloppy, incomplete product--it is important that these creators’ intentions be publicized. According to their words, they intended to create a piece of popular art encouraging tolerance.

When talking about Zootopia in 2020, in light of new and complex conversations about racism, we have to realize what Zootopia is.

In Part Three of the behind-the-scenes featurettes, the filmmakers speak about and show clips from an ABC documentary released in 1970, called The Eye of the Storm, in which a teacher of a class of white children conducts a social experiment with her students. She has half of her students put on small black collars. The teacher immediately set rules and limitations for those children to abide by that were intended to be perceived instantly as unfair. Later that day, the teacher gave students an academic test, and the students who wore collars performed significantly worse having been told that they were inferior. Some students even broke down crying over their new inferior social status. 

The teacher states in the documentary that she hoped to teach these children about the arbitrariness of racism. The filmmakers explain that this documentary was deeply influential for them in creating the film, not only for themselves in thinking about that arbitrariness of societally-imposed labels, but also with regard to the impact that can come from teaching young children about bias in ways they can understand.

The filmmakers were inspired by the problem of racism to create a film about bias. They did not, however, seek to create a film about racism, nor to create a film explaining it.

Bias is just one element of racism, and racism is just one kind of bias. Zootopia is ambitious to a fault, seemingly attempting to tackle tokenism, police brutality, regionalism, sexism, racial slurs, and racism more broadly. These are all issues and behaviors that result from the problem of bias. Racism is, of course, incredibly complex, and so is bias. But the concept at the center of bias--assuming something about someone based on their appearance or observable traits, is slightly easier to boil down for the sake of a kids’ film.

Producer Clark Spencer spoke about the need to simplify, which came with an enormous sense of responsibility. “On this film more than any other, this has been a very difficult story to nail down,” he said. “We were dealing with this important topic, and it needed to be told in a very elegant way… it’s a responsibility. They shouldn’t all be enormous ideas, but there should be something very optimistic and very hopeful in our storytelling that allows kids, teenagers, adults, to relate to that story and makes them think about something.”

This is a movie intended to teach children about loving your neighbor and being able to recognize bias in yourself. It is about avoiding relying on generalizations about the many that will cause you to create conclusions about the individual. It is not, at least directly, about racism.

“In this world, predator and prey have figured out a way to coexist in the same city. But what we’re going to find out is that coexistence isn’t as utopian as you might think. There is truly a problem in the city And that is the fundamental part that gets to the idea of bias, about two groups that assume something about somebody else,” says Spencer.

Exactly. Zootopia creates a problem in a fictional world--that predator and prey animals must now live together in coexistence, and it isn’t working as well as the city’s Thomas More-derived name would suggest, as the film quickly demonstrates. Then it uses that very fictional problem--that revolves around, remember, talking animals not getting along--to allude to macrocosmic issues plaguing the human world today. 

The conflict within Zootopia’s story alludes to the problem of racism, but any direct ties between Zootopia’s story about bias and the ongoing problem of racism in the United States are overextrapolations. Zootopia does not appear to stake its plot on the delineations between individual animal species--it draws its main distinctions between predators and prey. If the filmmakers sought to make a film with direct, literal statements about race to be carried literally into our human, 21st-century lives, they will have made a film that suggests there are only two races of human beings. It feels safe to assume that, if someone managed to work their way up to the best animation studio in the world, this is not something they believe.

Jared Bush comments on this universality in Part Three of the documentary. “I think that’s one of the biggest things for us. It’s not a specific group it’s not a specific race, it’s not a gender, it’s none of those things. It’s simply two groups that do not get along, and one group that’s feeling lesser than… For me, in thinking about what are we trying to say--it should feel universal.” 

Ultimately, the people who made Zootopia set out to tell a basic animal fable about bias, are following in the steps of a tradition as old as Aesop. It is unreasonable to throw out a film, or no longer be willing to learn from it or be entertained by it holistically as a work of art, because it doesn’t perfectly accomplish its many goals.

Zootopia is not intended to teach about racism specifically, but if a parent wants to use the film in a dinner conversation with young children about events going on in the United States right now, it is certainly a good introduction for very young children to these profound struggles and issues plaguing our world. And Zootopia should not by any means be the only thing a parent shows their child to teach them about racism.

And for those of us who are no longer children living in this complex world, Zootopia is an entertaining film that reminds us to be tolerant of those who are different from us, who we might expect to be one way but are in reality another.

In the words of Byron Howard in Part One of the featurette documentary:

“In this world of animals, where the animals are so different from one another, those things that are common are where they find that connection, and realize, ‘You’re not so different from me,’” stated Howard. “You may look different from me, you were brought up differently, but in the end, we all care about the same things. And we all deserve the respect that we want from each other. We all deserve to be happy in our lives. We deserve love, we deserve equality. And that’s why I think these movies are so powerful, because they are modern fables. We’re able to talk about things that are very very difficult, and we’re able to bring into conversation things that are kind of awkward to talk about. But that’s what the film is about.” 

It is also unreasonable to expect Disney to set out to make a film under the umbrella of the Aesop’s Fable model and capture every piece of nuance regarding one of the biggest social issues plaguing our world today. No filmmaker would walk into creating a movie with the intent of “explaining racism.” It would be wrong of their audience to accuse them of doing so. Further, to say that the filmmakers failed to create a way to explain racism to children is to assume “explaining racism” what they sought out to do.
           
If Zootopia wanted to perhaps shield itself from the critique that it oversimplifies—a critique that, perhaps surprisingly, only one Rotten Tomatoes reviewer leveled upon the film’s release in 2016—it could have put an explanatory statement before its opening scene.  Dreamworks’ 1998 film The Prince of Egypt, opened with a black title card and the following in white text:

“The motion picture you are about to see is an adaptation of the Exodus story. While artistic and historical license has been taken, we believe that this film is true to the essence, values, and integrity of a story that is a cornerstone of faith for millions of people worldwide. The biblical story of Moses can be found in the book of Exodus.”

Zootopia could have said something that would convey the following, “This is a family movie about a complex issue. We took artistic license—not only to make the story more entertaining when adapted into a film, but also to keep that film to a 90-minute runtime. This film is about a serious subject that is foundational to the lives of millions, but we believe this captures the ESSENCE of, or an introduction to, the story we want to tell.”

However, the film’s unspoken premise arguably serves in place of that statement. Zootopia is a Disney film, about talking animals, descended from the Aesop’s fable, intended for children. Animal fables have been used for centuries--think Aesop telling “The Fox and the Grapes” in the sixth century BCE--to simplify issues to teach children moral lessons. By definition, a fable is a simplification of an idea, simplified for the benefit of children who come of age in a complex world and must gradually come to understand complex ideas.

Clark Spencer mentions in Part Three of the documentary that the Disney team actually hired Dr. Shakti Butler, President and Founder of World Trust Educational Services, as a diversity consultant and advisor. Butler speaks about what she hoped Zootopia would accomplish with its immense reach as a Disney film:

“Disney’s role in creating culture is profound,” says Butler. “Culture teaches you who you are, where your place is in the world. And a lot of it is implicit. So if I go to school, and I see all the former principals are all white and they’re all male, I’m learning about power. If you’re going to create a society that’s equitable, you can’t do it without changing culture. And so when we shift culture, and children can see themselves inside of a story, and that they can play all different kinds of roles. That degree of flexibility is very important. Prejudice, of course, is something that everybody has. But where does prejudice come from? It comes from the ways that we are taught to be biased. And those two elements are linked together. And they’re also linked to the larger system of inequity.”

The way the film works with the image of the police force is certainly up for debate. It is at least worth noting that the filmmakers made the issue of bias central to its look at the police as well. Judy Hopps begins the film with the explicit goal of “wanting to make the world a better place” while not realizing her own bias, and then spends the rest of the movie realizing it in the context of her role as a police officer, and helps the rest of the force realize their own prejudice. At a minimum, this is a good step. After all, isn’t that one of the ultimate goals of the current conversation about policing in this country? To help officers realize bias within themselves and manage it?

Some have argued that Zootopia paints an entirely positive picture of police--which ignores Judy’s character arc and key moments in the storyline. In the middle of the film, Chief Bogo, a water buffalo (i.e. prey animal), says of Nick Wilde as a potential witness in an investigative case, “you think I’m going to believe a fox?” After Judy teaches Chief Bogo that, as he spells it out, “that the world has always been broken and that’s why we need good cops,” Bogo is later shown welcoming Nick to the police force.

It is probably clear that I am not dealing with the kind of suffering so many are during this time. It is a privilege to be able to sit and write out and publish an op-ed defending a Disney movie amidst an ongoing crisis of racial injustice and police brutality in this country.

I think that the question of whether this film is culturally renounced (or “canceled,” as the young’uns are calling it now) is not unimportant.

Back in 2015, I had just finished a tough freshman year of high school. Having transferred to a different high school for sophomore year, I had to rebuild myself--to find something that I was good at, that I would stand out for. I loved popular culture and literature, particularly The Lord of the Rings and Doctor Who, but I couldn’t quite place why. I knew I loved these series’ ethical and emotional depth, but I hadn’t yet mentally grasped what about that depth appealed to me. Going into my sophomore year of high school, I began to work with my interests in illustration and literature, and had begun working towards understanding my goals as a student and person in the world.

Nick Wilde by Alex Bowman, April 2016
But coming out of the Regal Cinemas theater on Zootopia’s opening night on March 4th, 2016, I finally realized what I loved about these works of popular art. By faithfully basing themselves on classical story structures, classic fables, and conflicts of good and evil and love and hate, these stories taught young children moral lessons. They helped them better understand in their hearts AND their minds the world they were about to grow into. Zootopia was released six months before Donald Trump was elected President, and its climactic scene of societal unrest was how I mentally framed this new world for myself from my small world as a high school student, coming into social and political consciousness during the most polarized time in American history since the Civil War. I remember looking over and making eye contact with my parents in the theater when the line “Have you considered a mandatory quarantine on predators?” was uttered by a Zootopian reporter to Judy in the press conference scene--earlier that afternoon I had just been reading headlines about then-candidate Donald Trump’s insinuations that quarantining all Muslims might be something he would champion as president.

Zootopia helped me to, even as a 16-year-old, start to wrap my head around the issue of tolerance, and how even those who consider themselves tolerant are likely to have seeds of bias, and even bigotry, inside them.

photo by Bruce Guthrie
The work I do today with political cartoons and satire is still based around my central mission of creating media to educate young people through entertainment. Zootopia enabled me to finally put the pieces together, to realize the power of media to affect the young and influence their minds for the better. My goal with my work across the board, both now and for the foreseeable future, is to realize the most effective means of doing just that.

If Zootopia is somehow “cancelled,” or made socially or culturally unacceptable to enjoy, generations of children will miss the chance to not only learn about the basics of tolerance--and perhaps even realize within themselves the potential of film to touch future generations. I hope that Zootopia can remain a beloved modern classic that will stay alive to do so. 

Alexandra Bowman is a freelance illustrator, political cartoonist, and fine artist from Washington, D.C. She serves as the Editorial Political Cartoonist for Our Daily Planet, a climate news platform. She serves as an in-house illustrator for Georgetown University’s Office of Communications. 

Alex is a member of the National Cartoonists Society and the Cartoonists Club of Great Britain, and is the youngest current member of the Association of American Editorial Cartoonists. She also currently serves as the Satire Correspondent on The Economist's Kevin "Kal" Kallaugher's webseries, "Satire Can Save Us All." During the Summer of 2020, she is interning for Voice of America, for whom she will be creating illustrations to be published across VOA's social media platforms. 

Alex is also the creator of “The Hilltop Show,” Georgetown University’s political comedy show, which seeks to present campus, national, and international news to a wide audience in an entertaining package. More information about the show can be found at hilltopshow.com. 

Alex has illustrated three children's books and has had work published by BBC News, BBC Books, Puffin Books, the Georgetown University Institute of Politics and Public Service, and Penguin Random House UK. Her work has been featured by a variety of groups on social media, including Disney XD and The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.